What is the Kaprekar Number?
(1) Take a four-digit number with different digits (acbd with .a<b<c<d).. (2) Form the largest and the smallest number from these four digits (dcba and abcd).. (3) Find the difference of these digits. Maybe this is 6174 (dcba - abcd = 6174?). If it is not, form the largest and the smallest number from the difference and subtract these numbers again. You may have to repeat this procedure. The end result is always 6174, but there are no more than 7 steps. 1st example: Take the number 1746. 1st step: 7641 - 1467 = 6174 2nd example: Take the number 5644. 1st step: 6544 - 4456 = 2088 2nd step: 8820 - 0288 = 8532 3rd step: 8532 - 2358 = 6174 3rd example: Take the number 7652. 1st step: 7652 - 2567 = 5085 2nd step: 8550 - 0558 = 7992 3rd step: 9972 - 2799 = 7173 4th step: 7731 - 1377 = 6354 5th step: 6543 - 3456 = 3087 6th step: 8730 - 0378 = 8352 7th step: 8532 - 2358 = 6174 The problem is solved. (Spektrum der Wissenschaft, Erstausgabe 1978) Manick Srinivasan and Ramkumar Ramamoorthy sent me more computer results: If you allow numbers with noughts at the beginning like 0342 or 0045, then the Kaprekar number fits for any four digit number except for 1111, 2222, 3333, 4444, 5555, 6666, 7777, 8888, 9999. They counted the numbers with the same steps: The 3n+1 Problem
(Collatz
Problem) top
1st example: The first number is 16. Sequence: 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 2nd example: The first number is 15. Sequence: 15, 46, 23, 70, 35, 106, 53, 160, 80, 40, 20,10, 5, 16, ,8 ,4 ,2 ,1 3rd example: If you begin with 77 671, you reach 1,570,824,736 as the biggest number. In the end you reach 1 after 232 steps. The problem has not been solved. (Spektrum der Wissenschaften 4/1984) The Steinhaus Cyclus
top
(1) Take any natural number with 4 digits. (abcd)
Handle this sum in the same way. Repeat this calculation.
1st example: Take the number 4363. Sequence: 70, 49, 97, 130, 10, 1, 1, 1, 1,... 2nd example: Take the number 9583. Sequence: 179, 131, 11, 2, 4, 16, 37, 58, 89, 145, 42, 20, 4, 16, 37, 58, 89, 145, 42, 20, 4, 16, 37, 58, 89, ... This theorem is proven in Steinhaus' book (3) on 3.5 pages. The 196-Problem
top
Perhaps the sum is a palindromic number. (This is a number,
which doesn't change, if you read it in reverse.)
In the end nearly all numbers lead to a palindromic number.
1st example: The number 49 is given. 1st sum: 49 + 94 = 143 2nd sum: 143 + 341 = 484 Result: 484 is a palindromic number. 2nd example: The number 88 is given. 1st sum: 88 + 88 = 176 2nd sum: 176 + 671 = 847 3rd sum: 847 + 748 = 1595 4th sum: 1595 + 5951 = 7546 5th sum: 7546 + 6457 = 14003 6th sum: 14003 + 30041 = 44044 Result: 44044 is a palindromic number. There are quite a lot of numbers, which don't seem to lead to palindromic numbers. The smallest is 196. There is no proof for this statement. The Number 1089
top
1st example: (1) 836 (2) 638 (3) |836-638| = 198 (4) 198+891 = 1089 2nd example (Rakesh): (1) 536 (2) 635 (3) |536 - 635| = 099 (4) 099+990 = 1089 The proof can be found through elementary mathematics. Source: (1) Page 16f. The number 222
top
Example: Take 369. There are the five numbers 396, 639,693, 936, 963 belonging to 369. The sum is 3996 = 222x(3+6+9). The proof can be found through elementary mathematics. You can formulate this problem for numbers with n digits. The Number 2997
top
Kaprekar Number on the Internet top English Alfred.Wassermann
Douglas E. Iannucci
Eric W. Weisstein (world of mathematics)
google.com (Web directory)
Math Fun Facts (Francis Su)
Terry Trotter
Wikipedia
Yutaka Nishiyama
Deutsch Alfred.Wassermann
KOW’s Blog
Mathetreff
Gomeck
Wikipedia
Winfrid Krone
References
top
Feedback: Email address on my main page This page is also available in German URL of
my Homepage:
© 2000 Jürgen Köller |